Last week, a handful of students walked out on a talk given by Israel Consul Akiva Tor at the UC Davis Law School. He urged them to stay- to continue the dialog and ask questions. But more and more we are learning that this is not about dialog- its not about peace or mutual understanding. Its about theatrics.
Law Student Elana Miller wrote in the Daily Aggie:
A university should be a place for exchanging ideas and discussing sensitive topics. When 30 students staged a protest during Israeli Consul General Akiva Tor's lecture at UC Davis School of Law last Tuesday evening, the intellectual integrity of that classroom was reduced to symbols of hate and hopelessness. The students would not engage in a conversation. They taped their mouths shut and walked out of the classroom as the Consul General begged them to stay and ask questions. But the students had already choreographed their protest. They knew how the evening would unfold before it began.
The topic of Tuesday's discussion was "Israel Today: Challenges and Opportunities." In publicizing this event, I did not mention Palestine, terrorism, rocket fire, recent murders or the heightened standard that is often applied when evaluating military action by Israel. The Consul General came to UC Davis to discuss the current climate in the Middle East, and how it affects Israel. The substance of his discussion, though, was irrelevant to the students' reactions. Akiva Tor's nation of affiliation was enough to spark protest and hate.
"Academic institutions are our best hope for an open dialogue between parties with conflicting interests. Thus, blind subscription to any ideology should be heavily discouraged on a university campus. Our responsibility as students is to explore the nuances of important political issues. It is dangerous when individuals and communities develop deep disdain for a country based on buzzwords from ideologues - apartheid, colonial, imperial, military occupation. I call on students to think critically and do their homework before adopting anything and everything under the liberal label. If you've done your homework and are still confident in your blanket disdain toward Israel, then bring those ideas to the classroom and let's have a discussion. My objective in organizing last Tuesday's event was to spark a dialogue as part of a slow shift from hopelessness to coexistence of ideas - at least at UC Davis. However, I must ask the students who taped their mouths shut and walked out on a discussion with Consul General Tor - what is your objective?
You seek to shift a civil exchange of ideas to a symbolic exchange of emotions, as symbols and emotions are harder to deconstruct than logically, factually sound dialogue. Is it insecurity in your beliefs? Intellectual laziness? Or perhaps you really are that angry and hopeless, and by refusing to engage with Israel's Consul General, you are urging the local and international community to also disengage with Israel, regardless of its actions. There is nothing Akiva Tor could have said that would have resonated. There is nothing he could have done that you would have seen. You came to our discussion not to talk, but to tape your mouth shut and complain that you aren't heard."
Read her full letter here
And to the students who walked out- by refusing to talk and by refusing to listen, you have rejected dialog, and you have rejected peace.
This conveniently omits several responses which refute what Miller claims. You may read one of them here http://theaggie.org/article/2011/04/21/guest-opinion-response
and find the rest by searching Israel 2011 in the search box on theaggie.org. Miller posted lies. One student civilly asked questions to Tor during the public Q&A section, but since Tor could not answer the question, the police were asked to escort the student out, but they would not because the student did not in violation of any rules for audience behavior. Tor claimed to want to speak personally with the questioning student afterward. Yet, the student waited for Tor to no avail.
Post a Comment