Sunday, August 19, 2018

UNRWA perpetuates the Palestinian refugee problem

Written by Jay Sekulow, in Foreign Policy  

UNRWA Has Changed the Definition of Refugee.  The U.N.'s agency for Palestinians should stop playing word games and do its job

UNRWA was founded in 1949 through U.N. General Assembly Resolution 302 at the conclusion of the Arab-Israeli conflict of 1948, aiming for “the alleviation of the conditions of starvation and distress among the Palestine refugees” from that conflict. The agency defines Palestinian refugees as “persons whose normal place of residence was Palestine during the period 1 June 1946 to 15 May 1948, and who lost both home and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 conflict.”

In 1965, UNRWA changed the eligibility requirements to be a Palestinian refugee to include third-generation descendants, and in 1982, it extended it again, to include all descendants of Palestine refugee males, including legally adopted children, regardless of whether they had been granted citizenship elsewhere. This classification process is inconsistent with how all other refugees in the world are classified, including the definition used by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the laws concerning refugees in the United States.

Under Article I(c)(3) of the 1951 U.N. Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, a person is no longer a refugee if, for example, he or she has “acquired a new nationality, and enjoys the protection of the country of his new nationality.” UNRWA’s definition of a Palestinian refugee, which is not anchored in treaty, includes no such provision.

Sekulow concludes with a quote from Lt. Gen. Alexander Galloway,  1952 director of UNRWA in Jordan:
It is perfectly clear that Arab nations do not want to solve the Arab refugee problem. They want to keep it as an open sore, as an affront against the United Nations and as a weapon against Israel. Arab leaders don’t give a damn whether the refugees live or die.
Read this important article here, and ask yourself and your elected representative, why is America the number one funder of this travesty?
The USA is the top funder of UNRWA

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

This is probably unrelated, but we need an article about this monstrosity at Market and Octavia in San Francisco:

Thank you!