Tuesday, April 14, 2015

Stanford Board of Trustees rejects BDS

The Stanford Board of Trustees concurs with what we've seen all along.  BDS causes "deep divisions" in the University community and unfavorably impacts campus climate.

Stanford Report, April 14, 2015  Statement of the Stanford Board of Trustees on divestment

For the last several months, Stanford has been evaluating a request submitted by Stanford Students for Justice in Palestine that it divest its endowment holdings of certain companies that do business in Israel. The Board concluded that the university's mission and its responsibility to support and encourage diverse opinions would be compromised by endorsing an institutional position on either side of an issue as complex as the Israel-Palestine conflict. Therefore the Board will not be taking action on this request, nor will it consider this request further.

In coming to this decision, the Board has observed the campus discussion surrounding the issue and received input from the Advisory Panel on Investment Responsibility and Licensing (APIRL). In its deliberations, the Board reflected on the fact that the Stanford community is diverse, with many groups and individuals – faculty, staff, students and alumni – highly engaged on all sides of this issue and other important issues of our time. A diversity of viewpoints and Stanford's commitment to open, thoughtful and civil debate are critical to the educational mission of the university.

The request from the Stanford Students for Justice in Palestine asserted that Stanford should divest its holdings in certain companies that they claim profit from human rights abuses and violations of international law in Israel/Palestine. Neither the APIRL nor the Board sought to determine the veracity of those claims, or to disprove them.

Rather than explore such issues, the Board focused on the questions of divisiveness and negative impact on its mission as contained in the Statement on Investment Responsibility. The Statement provides that if the Trustees conclude that a specific Trustee action "is likely to impair the capacity of the University to carry out its educational mission (for example, by causing significant adverse action on the part of governmental or other external agencies or groups, or by causing deep divisions within the University community), then the Trustees need not take such action." The Board concluded that any action on this issue would clearly have such an impact.

The Executive Director of Stanford Hillel Rabbi Serena Eisenberg responded:

Hillel applauds the Board of Trustees for this statement which makes clear that  the campaign to single out Israel and isolate specific communities at Stanford based on ethnic, religious, or cultural identity, is harmful to the campus environment and the university's reputation as a world-class educational institution. We steadfastly support the administration's broader efforts to promote debate in a strong intellectual climate, while ensuring that students uphold a civil campus environment.

We are proud of the extraordinarily robust opportunities for Jewish students to explore and develop positive Jewish identities during their college years, through a myriad of Hillel programs, Jewish Studies courses, Israel trips and many other offerings that comprise our flourishing Jewish community on campus...




2 comments:

Geoff Kl said...

the guys over at israellycool have a different take

http://www.israellycool.com/2015/04/15/stanfords-moral-vacuum-on-israel/

Gary Fouse said...

The Trustees actually considered this for several months?? They should have rejected it out of hand.